NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 96 Watt
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1140 vs 127
• 9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1140 vs 127

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

• 13.5x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 120 MHz
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 8 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 64 vs 32
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 208 gflops vs 80 gflops
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 150
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 44 vs 27
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 1679
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 1679

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	150 477
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	27 44
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1140 127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1140 127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1679 3161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1679 3161

Compare specifications (specs)