Intel HD Graphics 505 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 250 MHz vs 120 MHz
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 23 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 27
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 361 vs 150
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 4 June 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 250 MHz vs 120 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops vs 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 23 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 vs 27 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 361 vs 150 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 32 vs 18
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1679 vs 1635
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1679 vs 1635
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1140 vs 956
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1140 vs 956
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 32 vs 18 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1679 vs 1635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1679 vs 1635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1140 vs 956 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1140 vs 956 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 505 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1292 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 27 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 361 | 150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 956 | 1140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 | 1140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 505 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Apollo Lake GT1 | G96 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 4 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1532 | 1530 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 120 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 18 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 314 million |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-II |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
