NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • 4.4x more core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 120 MHz
  • Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
  • Around 59% better floating-point performance: 127.2 gflops vs 80 gflops
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 367 vs 150
  • Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 38 vs 27
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 1679
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 1679
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 14 August 2008 vs 4 June 2008
Core clock speed 530 MHz vs 120 MHz
Texture fill rate 12.72 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 48 vs 32
Floating-point performance 127.2 gflops vs 80 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 367 vs 150
PassMark - G2D Mark 38 vs 27
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2376 vs 1679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2376 vs 1679

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt vs 65 Watt
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 1598 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
367
150
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
38
27
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2376
1679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2376
1679
Name NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 367 150
PassMark - G2D Mark 38 27
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2376 1679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2376 1679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1140

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G94 G96
Launch date 14 August 2008 4 June 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $99.95
Place in performance rating 1528 1530
Price now $99.95
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 7.66

Technical info

Core clock speed 530 MHz 120 MHz
Floating-point performance 127.2 gflops 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 48 32
Texture fill rate 12.72 GTexel / s 8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 23 Watt
Transistor count 505 million 314 million
CUDA cores 32

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-HE MXM-II
Laptop size large medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 51.1 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1598 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

PowerMizer 8.0
PureVideo HD
CUDA
PCI-E 2.0