NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 4.4x more core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 120 MHz
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 59% better floating-point performance: 127.2 gflops vs 80 gflops
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 367 vs 150
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 38 vs 27
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 1679
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 1679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 4 June 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 530 MHz vs 120 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops vs 80 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 367 vs 150 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 vs 27 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2376 vs 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2376 vs 1679 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 65 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1598 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 367 | 150 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | 27 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2376 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2376 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1140 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1140 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G94 | G96 |
| Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 4 June 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.95 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1528 | 1530 |
| Price now | $99.95 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.66 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 120 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 314 million |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-HE | MXM-II |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.1 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1598 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
| CUDA | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||

