NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT and NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 350 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 532 MHz
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 137 vs 33
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 57 vs 56
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 August 2008 vs 4 April 2005 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 532 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 vs 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 vs 56 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE
- 79.5x more texture fill rate: 700 MTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 700 MTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 | 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | 56 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G96 | NV44 A2 |
Launch date | 19 August 2008 | 4 April 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 1578 | 1579 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $41.24 | |
Price now | $41.24 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 350 MHz |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 84.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 700 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Transistor count | 314 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 532 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |