NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT and NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 57 vs 53
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 August 2008 vs 12 August 2004 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 110 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 vs 53 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 143 vs 137
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 143 vs 137 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 | 143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | 53 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G96 | NV43 A2 |
Launch date | 19 August 2008 | 12 August 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1579 | 1581 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $64.95 | |
Price now | $64.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 84.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Transistor count | 314 million | 146 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |