NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 320M and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 210 vs 137
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 57
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1735 vs 1465
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1735 vs 1465
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2010 vs 19 August 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 210 vs 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1735 vs 1465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1735 vs 1465 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 450 MHz
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 320M | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 210 | 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 57 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1735 | 1465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1735 | 1465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 320M | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | MCP89 | G96 |
Launch date | 1 April 2010 | 19 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1576 | 1579 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 32 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 84.8 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |