NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3297 vs 2187
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3297 vs 2187
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 7 January 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3297 vs 2187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3297 vs 2187 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 530 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 120 vs 48
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 144 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 530 MHz |
| Pipelines | 120 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 144 gflops vs 127.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
GPU 2: ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS | ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 278 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3297 | 2187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3297 | 2187 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS | ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
| Code name | G94 | M86 |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 7 January 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1461 | 1462 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | 144 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 180 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 120 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 378 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 / GDDR3 / GDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||