NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS vs ATI Radeon HD 3850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS and ATI Radeon HD 3850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 10.69 GTexel / s
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 38 vs 29
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 19 November 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s vs 10.69 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 vs 29 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 668 MHz vs 530 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 427.5 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1660 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 401 vs 278
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 3297
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 3297
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 668 MHz vs 530 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 427.5 gflops vs 127.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1660 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 401 vs 278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 3297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 3297 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS | ATI Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 278 | 401 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | 29 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3297 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3297 | 3345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS | ATI Radeon HD 3850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
| Code name | G94 | RV670 |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 19 November 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1461 | 1463 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 668 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | 427.5 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 180 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s | 10.69 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 208 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 53.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1660 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||