NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT and ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 6.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
Launch date | 21 July 2008 vs 25 October 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 6.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
- Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 105 Watt
- Around 53% higher memory clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 56 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | R500 |
Code name | G92 | RV570 |
Launch date | 21 July 2008 | 25 October 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Place in performance rating | 1063 | not rated |
Price now | $103.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 575 MHz |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 112 | |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec | 6.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | 66 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 2x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | 44.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |