NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
- 3x more pipelines: 336 vs 112
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 873.6 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 2845
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 2845
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3304
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 October 2010 vs 21 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 336 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 150 Watt
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3304 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF104 | G92 |
Launch date | 11 October 2010 | 21 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1088 | 1089 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $103.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |