NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3100M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
6.9x more pipelines: 768 vs 112
3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 105 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
3.6x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 900 MHz
5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2270 vs 454
5.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 56

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 21 July 2008
Texture fill rate	45.18 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
Pipelines	768 vs 112
Floating-point performance	1,084 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 105 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2270 vs 454
PassMark - G2D Mark	323 vs 56

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

2.1x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 706 MHz
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 2502
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 2616
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 2502
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 2616

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1500 MHz vs 706 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2845 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3304 vs 2616
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2845 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3304 vs 2616

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2270

454

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

323

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2502

2845

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2616

3304

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2502

2845

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2616

3304

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark	2270	454
PassMark - G2D Mark	323	56
Geekbench - OpenCL	6076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	19.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	426.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	38.135
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2502	2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2616	3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2502	2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2616	3304
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla
Code name	GK104	G92
Launch date	23 July 2013	21 July 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,999	$160
Place in performance rating	1060	1063
Price now	$1,999	$103.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	1.38	8.86
Technical info
Core clock speed	706 MHz	1500 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,084 gflops	336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	768	112
Texture fill rate	45.18 GTexel / s	33.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	105 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	754 million
CUDA cores		112
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		9" (22.9 cm)
SLI options		2-way
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB / s	57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	900 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI