NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3100M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
  • 6.9x more pipelines: 768 vs 112
  • 3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 105 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
  • 3.6x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2264 vs 460
  • 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 61
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 21 July 2008
Texture fill rate 45.18 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
Pipelines 768 vs 112
Floating-point performance 1,084 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 105 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2264 vs 460
PassMark - G2D Mark 324 vs 61

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 706 MHz
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 2502
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 2616
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 2502
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 2616
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 706 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2845 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3304 vs 2616
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2845 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3304 vs 2616

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2264
460
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
324
61
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2502
2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2616
3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2502
2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2616
3304
Name NVIDIA Quadro K3100M NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 2264 460
PassMark - G2D Mark 324 61
Geekbench - OpenCL 6064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 19.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 426.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 38.135
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2502 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2616 3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2502 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2616 3304
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla
Code name GK104 G92
Launch date 23 July 2013 21 July 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $1,999 $160
Place in performance rating 1074 1077
Price now $1,999 $103.99
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 1.38 8.86

Technical info

Core clock speed 706 MHz 1500 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,084 gflops 336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 768 112
Texture fill rate 45.18 GTexel / s 33.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 105 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 754 million
CUDA cores 112
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
Display Port 1.2
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Length 9" (22.9 cm)
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 2.1
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB / s 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz 900 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI