NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
- Around 96% better floating-point performance: 470.0 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3237
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3237
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 83 vs 81
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 494 vs 381
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 January 2009 vs 29 July 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 470.0 gflops vs 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 3237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 3237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 83 vs 81 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 494 vs 381 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 141 Watt
- Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 141 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.986 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.56 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 83 | 81 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 494 | 381 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92B | G92 |
Launch date | 16 January 2009 | 29 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Place in performance rating | 1328 | 1329 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 470.0 gflops | 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 128 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 141 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI | ||
PureVideo HD |