NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 3.7x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 28 GTexel / s
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 128 vs 112
• Around 68% better floating-point performance: 470.0 gflops vs 280 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3285
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3285
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 83 vs 81
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 494 vs 372

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

• Around 81% lower typical power consumption: 78 Watt vs 141 Watt
• Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3285
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	83 81
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	494 372

Compare specifications (specs)