NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• 3x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 602 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 38.5 GTexel / s
• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 470.0 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 141 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 83 vs 64

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
• 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
• Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3309
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3309
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 986 vs 494

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3358
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	83 64
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	494 986

Compare specifications (specs)