NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT and ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 8.6x more texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 96 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 8.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 46
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 1 July 2004 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 8 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 vs 46 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 110 vs 81
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 vs 81 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 46 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | 110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3237 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3237 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | R400 |
| Code name | G92 | M18 |
| Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 1 July 2004 |
| Place in performance rating | 1345 | 1347 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 350 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 360 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 160 million |
| Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 300 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | 256 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
| Powerplay | ||
