NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 311.04 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 774 vs 381
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 237 vs 81
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 vs 3237
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 vs 3237
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 vs 29 July 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops vs 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 774 vs 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 vs 81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 vs 3237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 vs 3237 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec
| Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 774 | 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 | 81 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2626 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 | 3237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 | 3237 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 29 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1342 | 1345 |
| Price now | $69.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops | 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
| Gigaflops | 360 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||

