NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT and ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 240 MHz
- 24x more pipelines: 96 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 64 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 127x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 1 September 2002 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 240 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
- 40x more texture fill rate: 960 MTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 111 vs 81
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 960 MTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 vs 81 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | 111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3237 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 7 |
Code name | G92 | M9 |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 1 September 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1345 | 1348 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 240 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 960 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 36 million |
Boost clock speed | 240 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 200 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 128 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PureVideo HD |