NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 64 vs 32
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 84.8 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 376 vs 137
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 87 vs 57
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3076 vs 1465
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3076 vs 1465
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 84.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 vs 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 87 vs 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3076 vs 1465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3076 vs 1465 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 87 | 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3076 | 1465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3076 | 1465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94 | G96 |
Launch date | 21 August 2008 | 19 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1339 | 1579 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 84.8 gflops |
Gigaflops | 240 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |