NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- 692.9x more texture fill rate: 23.49 GTexel/s vs 33.9 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 250.6x more memory clock speed: 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) vs 5.0 GB/s
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8354 vs 3478
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8354 vs 3478
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Jan 2021 vs 27 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 23.49 GTexel/s vs 33.9 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8354 vs 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8354 vs 3478 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
| Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8354 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8354 | 3478 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP108 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 13 Jan 2021 | 27 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 153 | 1003 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 31.32 GFLOPS (1:24) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 751.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 23.49 GTexel/s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) | 5.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010 vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
