NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 41 Watt
• 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 vs 2220
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 vs 6869
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 vs 22.112
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.937 vs 15.363
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 vs 99.125
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 vs 2970
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 2490
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 vs 2970
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 2490

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 442
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 170.785
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 1.373
• 20.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 702 vs 35

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	442 480
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9864 6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.898 22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	170.785 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.373 1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.937 15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	160.823 99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3629 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3629 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	35 702

Compare specifications (specs)