NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro K620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- Environ 49% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 37% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 41 Watt
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 versus 2220
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 6869
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 22.112
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.937 versus 15.363
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 99.125
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 2970
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 2490
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 2970
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 2490
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 22 July 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 41 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 versus 2220 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 6869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 22.112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 versus 15.363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 99.125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 3329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 versus 442
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 versus 170.785
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 versus 1.373
- 20.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 702 versus 35
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 versus 442 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 versus 170.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 versus 1.373 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 versus 35 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 2220 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 480 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 6869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 22.112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 297.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 1.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 15.363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 99.125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | $189.89 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 953 |
| Prix maintenant | $59.99 | $189.93 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | 15.23 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 160 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5650
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
ATIRadeon X600
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX150
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile
