NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 993 MHz
• Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1072 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 1024x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 307
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 vs 8849
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 vs 137.786

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 vs 2433
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 36.898
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 170.785
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 1.373
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 18.937
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 3629
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3684
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3331
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 3629
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3684
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3331
• 28.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1002 vs 35

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 2835
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	442 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9864 8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.898 38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	170.785 721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.373 3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.937 42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	160.823 137.786
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3629 4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3629 4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	35 1002

Compare specifications (specs)