NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Environ 56% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1072 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 40 Watt
- 1024x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 versus 307
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 8849
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 137.786
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 18 August 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 993 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1072 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 8849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 137.786 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 versus 2433
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 versus 36.898
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 versus 170.785
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 versus 1.373
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 versus 18.937
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3331
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3331
- 28.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1002 versus 35
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 versus 2433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 versus 36.898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 versus 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 versus 1.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 versus 18.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 versus 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 versus 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3331 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 versus 35 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 2835 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 8849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 38.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 721.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 3.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 42.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 137.786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 1002 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 18 August 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | $200.89 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 806 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | $203.37 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | 16.10 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 993 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 40 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 1,017 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB / 4 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |