NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM and ATI FireMV 2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 324 MHz
- 9.1x more texture fill rate: 11.81 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 110 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 1008 MHz vs 392 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 169 vs 36
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 March 2009 vs 1 January 2006 |
Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 324 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.81 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1008 MHz vs 392 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 169 vs 36 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 vs 80
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 vs 80 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | ATI FireMV 2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 169 | 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 80 | 259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 179.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1813.265 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 757.451 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1731 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | ATI FireMV 2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 9 |
Code name | G96C | RV370 |
Launch date | 10 March 2009 | 1 January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 652 | 654 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 324 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 117.5 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 11.81 GTexel / s | 1.296 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.13 GB / s | 3.136 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1008 MHz | 392 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | DDR |