NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 vs NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 and NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 8x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 790 MHz vs 668 MHz
- 9.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 220 vs 23
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 January 2010 vs 18 January 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 790 MHz vs 668 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 220 vs 23 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 98 vs 44
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 98 vs 44 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 220 | 23 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 98 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1686 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | NVIDIA GeForce 7200 GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G94 | G72 |
Launch date | 26 January 2010 | 18 January 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1583 | 1416 |
Price now | $79.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | |
Transistor count | 505 million | 112 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.3 GB / s | 5.34 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | 668 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |