NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 105.6 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 39 vs 37
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1727 vs 1640
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1727 vs 1640
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 14 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 39 vs 37 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1727 vs 1640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1727 vs 1640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 221 vs 212
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 vs 212 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 212 | 221 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 39 | 37 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5644 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1727 | 1640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1727 | 1640 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT216 | G96 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1601 | 1603 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $527 | |
Price now | $527 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops | 80 gflops |
Gigaflops | 158 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | HDA | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3) | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 |