NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 310 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 310

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 23 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 263 vs 216
• 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 38

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 523 MHz
• Around 91% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 105.6 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
• 6.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5644 vs 880
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1727 vs 1229
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1727 vs 1229

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 310
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	263 216
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	179 38
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	880 5644
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1229 1727
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1229 1727

Compare specifications (specs)