NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 and NVIDIA GeForce2 Go videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 9.4x more core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 143 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 180 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 512 MB or 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 5.1x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 332 MHz
- 126x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 504 vs 4
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2009 vs 11 November 2000 |
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 180 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB or 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 332 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 504 vs 4 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
- 32.5x more texture fill rate: 572 MTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 34.5x lower typical power consumption: 2 Watt vs 69 Watt
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 95 vs 48
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 572 MTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 2 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 95 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | NVIDIA GeForce2 Go |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 504 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 48 | 95 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | NVIDIA GeForce2 Go | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Celsius |
Code name | GT215 | NV11 B2 |
Launch date | 17 November 2009 | 11 November 2000 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
Place in performance rating | 1390 | 1393 |
Price now | $37.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz | 143 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 180 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 572 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | 2 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 20 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 3.2 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB or 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB / s | 5.31 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz | 332 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |