ATI Radeon HD 5570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5570 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
- 2x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 69 Watt
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 48
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1385
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1385
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 October 2011 vs 17 November 2009 |
Pipelines | 400 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 48 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1385 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
- Around 70% higher memory clock speed: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 504 vs 477
- 6.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9236 vs 1378
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1979 vs 1883
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1979 vs 1883
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 504 vs 477 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 vs 1378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 vs 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 vs 1883 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | 504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 48 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1378 | 9236 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 | 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 | 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Turks | GT215 |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch date | 11 October 2011 | 17 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1387 | 1390 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
Price now | $37.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 727 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB or 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 54.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |