NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 311.04 gflops
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 96% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.495 vs 6.139
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 251.012 vs 171.053
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.333 vs 9.729
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1583 vs 1208
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 vs 2053
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1583 vs 1208
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 vs 2053
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 May 2012 vs 1 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 311.04 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3140 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 vs 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 vs 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 vs 9.729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 vs 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 vs 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 vs 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 vs 2053 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 774 vs 704
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 237 vs 171
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2626 vs 2344
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.871 vs 13.954
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 vs 3127
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 vs 3127
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 774 vs 704 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 vs 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2626 vs 2344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 vs 0.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 vs 13.954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 vs 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 vs 3127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 704 | 774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 237 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2344 | 2626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 | 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 | 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 | 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 | 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.954 | 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 | 3275 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF108 | GF108 |
Launch date | 4 May 2012 | 1 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $849.99 | $79 |
Place in performance rating | 1340 | 1342 |
Price now | $849.99 | $69.99 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | 14.03 |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | Up to 384 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3140 MHz | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |