NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 vs ATI Radeon HD 4830
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and ATI Radeon HD 4830 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 575 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 56
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2011 vs 21 October 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 56 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4830
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec
- 6.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 96
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 736.0 gflops vs 311.04 gflops
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 844 vs 772
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3275
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3275
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 736.0 gflops vs 311.04 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 844 vs 772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3275 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4830
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | ATI Radeon HD 4830 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 772 | 844 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 56 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | ATI Radeon HD 4830 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF108 | RV770 |
Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 21 October 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $130 |
Place in performance rating | 1337 | 1338 |
Price now | $69.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 575 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops | 736.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion / sec | 18.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 246 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |