NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 450 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 80 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 285 vs 260
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1639 vs 882
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1639 vs 882

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500

• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 7.2 billion / sec
• Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 53

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	285 260
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	53 81
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 882
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 882

Compare specifications (specs)