NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 billion / sec vs 6.7 billion / sec
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 23 Watt
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.403 vs 13.944
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1583 vs 719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1639 vs 690
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1583 vs 719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1639 vs 690

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 215.04 gflops vs 172.8 gflops
• Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 528 vs 282
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 53
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1860 vs 1458
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.184 vs 3.315
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 172.058 vs 122.375
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.145 vs 7.629
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 859 vs 692
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 859 vs 692

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	282 528
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	53 171
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1458 1860
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.315 4.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	122.375 172.058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.629 8.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.403 13.944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	692 859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1583 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	692 859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1583 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 690

Compare specifications (specs)