NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 billion / sec vs 6.7 billion / sec
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 23 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.403 vs 13.944
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1583 vs 719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1639 vs 690
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1583 vs 719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1639 vs 690
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 billion / sec vs 6.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.403 vs 13.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1583 vs 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1639 vs 690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1583 vs 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1639 vs 690 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 215.04 gflops vs 172.8 gflops
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 283
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 54
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1875 vs 1490
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.184 vs 3.315
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 172.058 vs 122.375
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.145 vs 7.629
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 859 vs 692
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 859 vs 692
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 215.04 gflops vs 172.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 523 vs 283 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 54 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1875 vs 1490 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.184 vs 3.315 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 172.058 vs 122.375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.145 vs 7.629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 859 vs 692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 859 vs 692 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 283 | 523 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 54 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1490 | 1875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.315 | 4.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 122.375 | 172.058 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.629 | 8.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.403 | 13.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 692 | 859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1583 | 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1639 | 690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 692 | 859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1583 | 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1639 | 690 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.459 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF119 | GF108 |
Launch date | 30 May 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1572 | 1574 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1120 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 172.8 gflops | 215.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 billion / sec | 6.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
3D Vision |