NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 40% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 500 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 668 vs 454
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 238 vs 89

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	14 May 2011 vs 15 July 2008
Core clock speed	700 MHz vs 500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	668 vs 454
PassMark - G2D Mark	238 vs 89

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

2.5x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
Around 17% higher pipelines: 112 vs 96
Around 4% better floating-point performance: 280 gflops vs 268.8 gflops

Texture fill rate	28 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	112 vs 96
Floating-point performance	280 gflops vs 268.8 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

668

454

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

238

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark	668	454
PassMark - G2D Mark	238	89
Geekbench - OpenCL	2262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	175.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.27
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2716

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla
Code name	GF108	G92
Launch date	14 May 2011	15 July 2008
Place in performance rating	1361	1364
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Launch price (MSRP)		$328.50
Price now		$328.50
Value for money (0-100)		2.78
Technical info
Core clock speed	700 MHz	500 MHz
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops	280 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	96	112
Texture fill rate	11.2 GTexel / s	28 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	754 million
CUDA cores per GPU		112
Gigaflops		420
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
HybridPower
PureVideo HD
SLI