NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 108 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 236 vs 52
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2011 vs 30 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 vs 52 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 72% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 824 vs 671
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 2304
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3258 vs 2716
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3258 vs 2716
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 824 vs 671 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3258 vs 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3258 vs 2716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 671 | 824 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 52 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2304 | 13337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.698 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 175.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.497 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.27 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 3258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 3258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF108 | GT200B |
Launch date | 14 May 2011 | 30 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1360 | 1362 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |