NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M and NVIDIA GeForce 9400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 580 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 vs 101
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 91 vs 55
- 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.85 vs 0.537
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 vs 1117
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 vs 1117
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 15 October 2008 |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 vs 101 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 91 vs 55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.85 vs 0.537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2701 vs 1117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2701 vs 1117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 35 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | NVIDIA GeForce 9400M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 | 101 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 91 | 55 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2171 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.85 | 0.537 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.727 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 960 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2210 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2701 | 1117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 960 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2210 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2701 | 1117 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | NVIDIA GeForce 9400M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | C79MX |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 15 October 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1503 | 1647 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 672 MHz | 580 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 258.05 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |