NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 127 vs 88
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 vs 960
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 vs 960

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 258.05 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 479 vs 436
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2155 vs 2102
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.85 vs 4.233
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 vs 161.144
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 vs 0.519
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 vs 7.151
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 vs 16.605
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1595
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 vs 2392
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1595
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 vs 2392

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	436 479
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	127 88
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2102 2155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.233 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.144 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.519 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.151 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.605 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1595 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1595 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2701

Compare specifications (specs)