NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.85 vs 4.651
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1790
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 vs 1352
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1790
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 vs 1352

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 740 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 11.8 billion / sec vs 10.8 billion / sec
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 284.16 gflops vs 258.05 gflops
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 573 vs 479
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 88
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2351 vs 2155
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 213.211 vs 195.796
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.624 vs 0.561
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.521 vs 9.109
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.978 vs 16.727
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1056 vs 960
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1056 vs 960

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	479 573
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	88 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2155 2351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.85 4.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	195.796 213.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.561 0.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.109 10.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.727 23.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	960 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2210 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2701 1352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	960 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2210 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2701 1352

Compare specifications (specs)