NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 49 Watt
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.85 vs 3.396
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 vs 87.094
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 vs 0.243
  • Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 vs 5.005
  • 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 vs 3.764
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1713
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 vs 1624
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1713
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 vs 1624
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2011 vs 11 October 2010
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 49 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.85 vs 3.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 195.796 vs 87.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.561 vs 0.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.109 vs 5.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.727 vs 3.764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2210 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2701 vs 1624
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2210 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2701 vs 1624

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 672 MHz
  • Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 10.8 billion / sec
  • Around 4% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 258.05 gflops
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 602 vs 478
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 202 vs 90
  • Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2228 vs 2154
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 960
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 960
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1400 MHz vs 672 MHz
Texture fill rate 11.2 billion / sec vs 10.8 billion / sec
Floating-point performance 268.8 gflops vs 258.05 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 602 vs 478
PassMark - G2D Mark 202 vs 90
Geekbench - OpenCL 2228 vs 2154
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1080 vs 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1080 vs 960

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
478
602
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
90
202
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2154
2228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.85
3.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
195.796
87.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.561
0.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9.109
5.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16.727
3.764
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
960
1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2210
1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2701
1624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
960
1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2210
1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2701
1624
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
PassMark - G3D Mark 478 602
PassMark - G2D Mark 90 202
Geekbench - OpenCL 2154 2228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.85 3.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 195.796 87.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.561 0.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.109 5.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.727 3.764
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 960 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2210 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2701 1624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 960 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2210 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2701 1624
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Fermi
Code name GF108 GF108
Launch date 5 January 2011 11 October 2010
Place in performance rating 1500 1501
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $79
Price now $35.99
Value for money (0-100) 20.89

Technical info

Core clock speed 672 MHz 1400 MHz
CUDA cores 96
Floating-point performance 258.05 gflops 268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 96
Texture fill rate 10.8 billion / sec 11.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 49 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 585 million
CUDA cores per GPU 96
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Bus support PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height 2.713" (6.9 cm)
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 API 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus