NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 144 vs 112
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 414.7 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1105 vs 457
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 58
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3323 vs 2845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3304
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3323 vs 2845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 May 2011 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Pipelines | 144 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1105 vs 457 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3323 vs 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3323 vs 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 720 MHz
- Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 17.28 GTexel / s
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 17.28 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1105 | 457 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | 58 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3635 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 306.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.883 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.564 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 35.369 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3323 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3323 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GF116 | G92 |
| Launch date | 14 May 2011 | 21 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $160 |
| Place in performance rating | 1085 | 1087 |
| Price now | $55.59 | $103.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.90 | 8.86 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 144 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.28 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545 vs
ATIFireMV 2200 PCI
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250E
