NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 17.28 GTexel / s
- 3.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 144
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 414.7 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 3677
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 10.32
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 306.536
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 0.883
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 18.564
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 vs 35.369
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 14 May 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 17.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 144 |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 414.7 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 vs 3677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 vs 10.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 vs 306.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 vs 0.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 vs 18.564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 vs 35.369 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 250 Watt
Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 | 3677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 | 10.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 | 306.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 | 0.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | 18.564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 | 35.369 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1101 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF110 | GF116 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 14 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1090 | 1092 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $55.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 26.90 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 720 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops | 414.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 144 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 17.28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 70 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,170 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 177.6 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |