NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 589 MHz
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 105.6 gflops
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1024 MB vs 512 MB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 313 vs 156
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 vs 50
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1155 vs 1062
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1155 vs 1062
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 22 February 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 589 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 105.6 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1024 MB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 313 vs 156 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 vs 50 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 vs 1062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 vs 1062 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec
- 1200x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4683 vs 1282
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 vs 1282 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 313 | 156 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 50 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1282 | 4683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 1062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 1062 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF119 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 22 February 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1627 | 1629 |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 589 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 105.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
| Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | 7.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 12.64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 405 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 315 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 DDR4
