NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and AMD Radeon HD 6450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 6.5 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 312 vs 197
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 vs 119
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1281 vs 639
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.471 vs 1.878
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.233 vs 0.231
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.018 vs 4.982
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 555 vs 497
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 835 vs 810
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 555 vs 497
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 835 vs 810
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 7 April 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 312 vs 197 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 vs 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1281 vs 639 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 vs 1.878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 vs 0.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 vs 4.982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 vs 810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 vs 810 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 200.0 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
- 800x more memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 97.327 vs 77.99
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.314 vs 4.053
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1627 vs 1155
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1627 vs 1155
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops vs 155.5 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 97.327 vs 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.314 vs 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 vs 1155 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 312 | 197 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1281 | 639 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | 1.878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | 97.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | 0.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | 4.982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | 19.314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | 810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 1627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | 810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 1627 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF119 | Caicos |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 7 April 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | $55 |
| Place in performance rating | 1627 | 1628 |
| Price now | $39.99 | $39.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | 9.02 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
| Pipelines | 48 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 370 million |
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 160 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 4 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5) |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 405 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 315 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 DDR4
