NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 567 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 6.5 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 4x better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1024 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1155 vs 1023
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1155 vs 1023
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 4 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 567 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1024 MB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 vs 1023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 vs 1023 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 29 Watt
- 666x more memory clock speed: 666 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 29 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 666 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 1023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 1023 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF119 | G98 |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 4 December 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1626 | 1650 |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 567 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | 4.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 666 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |