Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 29 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 vs 2.471
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.427 vs 0.233
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.882 vs 4.053
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 835
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 1155
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 835
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 1155

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

• 4.1x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 48 vs 12
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 vs 318
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 131 vs 92
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1283 vs 1004
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 77.99 vs 56.77
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.018 vs 5.876
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 555 vs 476
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 555 vs 476

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 322
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	92 131
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1004 1283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.952 2.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.77 77.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.427 0.233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.876 6.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.882 4.053
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 835
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 835
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1155

Compare specifications (specs)