AMD Radeon HD 8250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8250 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1343 vs 1155
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1343 vs 1155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 2 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1343 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1343 vs 1155 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1281 vs 1075
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 vs 59
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 317 vs 212
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 835 vs 628
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 835 vs 628
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 555 vs 384
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 555 vs 384
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1281 vs 1075 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 vs 59 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 317 vs 212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 vs 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 vs 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 vs 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 vs 384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1075 | 1281 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 129 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 212 | 317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 628 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 628 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1343 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1343 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 384 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 384 | 555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8250 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Temash | GF119 |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 2 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1619 | 1621 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | |
Transistor count | 292 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |