NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 74% better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1024 MB vs 256 / 512 MB
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 vs 172
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 131 vs 32
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.471 vs 0.612
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 77.99 vs 56.838
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 29 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1024 MB vs 256 / 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 vs 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 vs 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 vs 0.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 vs 56.838 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 billion / sec vs 6.5 billion / sec
- 800x more memory clock speed: 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 1155
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 1155
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec vs 6.5 billion / sec |
Memory clock speed | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 vs 1155 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 | 32 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | 0.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | 56.838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 1505 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF119 | G96C |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 29 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | $85.99 |
Place in performance rating | 1626 | 1666 |
Price now | $39.99 | $85.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | 4.13 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | 8.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 6.875" (17.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | 256 / 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |