NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 75% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 500 MHz
Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 14 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
4.2x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1580 MHz
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2029 vs 1458
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2029 vs 1458

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	24 April 2012 vs 3 March 2010
Core clock speed	875 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate	14 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	192 vs 24
Floating-point performance	336.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz vs 1580 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2029 vs 1458
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2029 vs 1458

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

3.6x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 50 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	14 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2029

1458

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2029

1458

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	182.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.65
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	18.19
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2029	1458
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2029	1458
PassMark - G3D Mark		107
PassMark - G2D Mark		33
Geekbench - OpenCL		3307
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1774
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1774

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GK107	GT216
Launch date	24 April 2012	3 March 2010
Place in performance rating	1514	1517
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	875 MHz	500 MHz
Floating-point performance	336.0 gflops	80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	24
Texture fill rate	14 GTexel / s	8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	14 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	486 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1580 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
HybridPower
PCI-E 2.0