NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 14 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 75% better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 182.993 vs 162.162
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.475 vs 0.426
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.19 vs 12.306
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2029 vs 1731
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2029 vs 1731
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 April 2012 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 14 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.993 vs 162.162 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.475 vs 0.426 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.19 vs 12.306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2029 vs 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2029 vs 1731 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 875 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.329 vs 2.907
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 875 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.329 vs 2.907 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.907 | 4.329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.993 | 162.162 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.475 | 0.426 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.65 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.19 | 12.306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2029 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2029 | 1731 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 394 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1583 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 737 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 737 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK107 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 24 April 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1514 | 1516 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 14 GTexel / s | 6.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 585 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | (G)DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 320M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 420M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7650M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 OEM vs
NVIDIANVS 5200M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800M
