NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 76% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 2.907
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 182.993
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 vs 0.475
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 vs 7.65

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 14 GTexel / s vs 10.75 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• Around 30% better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 258.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.19 vs 16.851
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2029 vs 1099
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2029 vs 1099

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.829 2.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.966 182.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.539 0.475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.643 7.65
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.851 18.19
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 2029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 2029

Compare specifications (specs)