NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA NVS 5200M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 76% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1782 MHz
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 2.907
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 182.993
Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 vs 0.475
Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 vs 7.65

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 September 2012 vs 24 April 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed	3140 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.829 vs 2.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	189.966 vs 182.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.539 vs 0.475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.643 vs 7.65

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

Around 30% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 672 MHz
Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 14 GTexel / s vs 10.75 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
Around 30% better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 258.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.19 vs 16.851
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2029 vs 1099
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2029 vs 1099

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	875 MHz vs 672 MHz
Texture fill rate	14 GTexel / s vs 10.75 GTexel / s
Pipelines	192 vs 96
Floating-point performance	336.0 gflops vs 258.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	18.19 vs 16.851
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2029 vs 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2029 vs 1099

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.829

2.907

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

189.966

182.993

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.539

0.475

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9.643

7.65

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.851

18.19

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1099

2029

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1099

2029

Name	NVIDIA NVS 5200M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	511
PassMark - G2D Mark	188
Geekbench - OpenCL	2196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.829	2.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	189.966	182.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.539	0.475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.643	7.65
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.851	18.19
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1099	2029
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1099	2029
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2715

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA NVS 5200M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Code name	GF108	GK107
Launch date	17 September 2012	24 April 2012
Place in performance rating	1513	1514
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	672 MHz	875 MHz
Floating-point performance	258.0 gflops	336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	96	192
Texture fill rate	10.75 GTexel / s	14 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		145 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	25.12 GB / s	28.51 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3140 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0